Wednesday, August 21, 2013

THE HAITIAN REVOLUTION The Slave Rebellion of 1791

Violent conflicts between white colonists and black slaves were common in Saint-Domingue. Bands of runaway slaves, known as maroons (marrons), entrenched themselves in bastions in the colony's mountains and forests, from which they harried white-owned plantations both to secure provisions and weaponry and to avenge themselves against the inhabitants. As their numbers grew, these bands, sometimes consisting of thousands of people, began to carry out hit-and-run attacks throughout the colony. This guerrilla warfare, however, lacked centralized organization and leadership. The most famous maroon leader was François Macandal, whose six-year rebellion (1751-57) left an estimated 6,000 dead. Reportedly a boko, or voodoo sorcerer, Macandal drew from African traditions and religions to motivate his followers. The French burned him at the stake in Cap Français in 1758. Popular accounts of his execution that say the stake snapped during his execution have enhanced his legendary stature.
Many Haitians point to the maroons' attacks as the first manifestation of a revolt against French rule and the slaveholding system. The attacks certainly presaged the 1791 slave rebellion, which evolved into the Haitian Revolution. They also marked the beginning of a martial tradition for blacks, just as service in the colonial militia had done for the gens de couleur. The maroons, however, seemed incapable of staging a broad-based insurrection on their own. Although challenged and vexed by the maroons' actions, colonial authorities effectively repelled the attacks, especially with help from the gens de couleur, who were probably forced into cooperating.
The arrangement that enabled the whites and the landed gens de couleur to preserve the stability of the slaveholding system was unstable. In an economic sense, the system worked for both groups. The gens de couleur, however, had aspirations beyond the accumulation of goods. They desired equality with white colonists, and many of them desired power. The events set in motion in 1789 by the French Revolution shook up, and eventually shattered, the arrangement.
The National Assembly in Paris required the white Colonial Assembly to grant suffrage to the landed and tax-paying gens de couleur. (The white colonists had had a history of ignoring French efforts to improve the lot of the black and the mulatto populations.) The Assembly refused, leading to the first mulatto rebellion in Saint-Domingue. The rebellion, led by Vincent Ogé in 1790, failed when the white militia reinforced itself with a corps of black volunteers. (The white elite was constantly prepared to use racial tension between blacks and mulattoes to advantage.) Ogé's rebellion was a sign of broader unrest in Saint-Domingue.
A slave rebellion of 1791 finally toppled the colony. Launched in August of that year, the revolt represented the culmination of a protracted conspiracy among black leaders. According to accounts of the rebellion that have been told through the years, François-Dominique Toussaint Louverture helped plot the uprising, although this claim has never been substantiated. Among the rebellion's leaders were Boukman, a maroon and voodoo houngan (priest); Georges Biassou, who later made Toussaint his aide; Jean-François, who subsequently commanded forces, along with Biassou and Toussaint, under the Spanish flag; and Jeannot, the bloodthirstiest of them all. These leaders sealed their compact with a voodoo ceremony conducted by Boukman in the Bois Cayman (Alligator Woods) in early August 1791. On August 22, a little more than a week after the ceremony, the uprising of their black followers began.
The carnage that the slaves wreaked in northern settlements, such as Acul, Limbé, Flaville, and Le Normand, revealed the simmering fury of an oppressed people. The bands of slaves slaughtered every white person they encountered. As their standard, they carried a pike with the carcass of an impaled white baby. Accounts of the rebellion describe widespread
torching of property, fields, factories, and anything else that belonged to, or served, slaveholders. The inferno is said to have burned almost continuously for months.
News of the slaves' uprising quickly reached Cap Français. Reprisals against nonwhites were swift and every bit as brutal as the atrocities committed by the slaves. Although outnumbered, the inhabitants of Le Cap (the local diminutive for Cap Français) were well-armed and prepared to defend themselves against the tens of thousands of blacks who descended upon the port city. Despite their voodoo-inspired heroism, the ex-slaves fell in large numbers to the colonists' firepower and were forced to withdraw. The rebellion left an estimated 10,000 blacks and 2,000 whites dead and more than 1,000 plantations sacked and razed.
Even though it failed, the slave rebellion at Cap Français set in motion events that culminated in the Haitian Revolution. Mulatto forces under the capable leadership of André Rigaud, Alexandre Pétion, and others clashed with white militiamen in the west and the south (where, once again, whites recruited black slaves to their cause). Sympathy with the Republican cause in France inspired the mulattoes. Sentiment in the National Assembly vacillated, but it finally favored the enfranchisement of gens de couleur and the enforcement of equal rights. Whites, who had had little respect for royal governance in the past, now rallied behind the Bourbons and rejected the radical egalitarian notions of the French revolutionaries. Commissioners from the French Republic, dispatched in 1792 to Saint-Domingue, pledged their limited support to the gens de couleur in the midst of an increasingly anarchic situation. In various regions of the colony, black slaves rebelled against white colonists, mulattoes battled white levies, and black royalists opposed both whites and mulattoes. Foreign interventionists found these unstable conditions irresistible; Spanish and British involvement in the unrest in Saint-Domingue opened yet another chapter in the revolution.

A Rebellion to Remember: The Legacy of Nat Turner

Nat Turner is widely regarded as one of the most complex figures in American history and American literature. October marks the anniversary both of his birth and of his arrest as the leader of one of the United States' most famous slave rebellions.

Nat Turner was born October 2, 1800 on a plantation in Southampton County, Virginia. Turner was deeply committed to his Christian faith and believed he received messages from God through visions and signs in nature. When he was in his early 20s, these signs led him to return to his master after an escape attempt. Similarly, a solar eclipse and an unusual atmospheric event are believed to have inspired his insurrection, which began on August 21, 1831.

Nat Turner's rebellion was one of the bloodiest and most effective in American history. It ignited a culture of fear in Virginia that eventually spread to the rest of the South, and is said to have expedited the coming of the Civil War. In the immediate aftermath of the rebellion, however, many Southern states, including North Carolina, tightened restrictions on African Americans. Over the course of two days, dozens of whites were killed as Turner's band of insurrectionists, which eventually numbered over fifty, moved systematically from plantation to plantation in Southampton County. Most of the rebels were executed along with countless other African Americans who were suspected, often without cause, of participating in the conspiracy. Nat Turner, though, eluded capture for over two months. He hid in the Dismal Swamp area and was discovered accidentally by a hunter on October 30. He surrendered peacefully.

The Confessions of Nat Turner appeared shortly after Turner's capture. Published as the definitive account of the insurrection and its motivation, the "confession" remains shrouded in controversy. Thomas Gray, a lawyer, released the account, claiming that Turner had dictated the confessions to him and that there was little to no variation from the prisoner's actual testimony. However, as a slaveholder mired in financial difficulty, Gray likely saw tremendous profit and propaganda potential in satiating the public's thirst for knowledge about such an enigmatic figure. In addition, literary critics have consistently pointed to discrepancies in Turner's language and tone throughout the document. They suggest that Turner and Gray's agendas conflict consistently in the text and thus create the ambiguity that has characterized the document for over a century and a half.


The Confessions of Nat Turner is part of three collections on DocSouth: "North American Slave Narratives," which includes all the existing autobiographical narratives of fugitive and former slaves published as broadsides, pamphlets, or books in English up to 1920; "The Church and the Southern Black Community," which presents a collected history of the way Southern African Americans experienced and transformed Protestant Christianity into the central institution of community life; and "The North Carolina Experience, Beginnings to 1940" collects a wide variety of print and manuscript materials that tell the story of the Tar Heel State. vidoes included are Nat turner a troublesome property & Gospel of Nat turner by New Afrikan Scholar Ishakamusa barashango


George Jackson day of the gun (Assassination of George Jackson)


George Jackson the soul of armed liberation 

Precursor to the BLA
Black Liberation Army
3 black men killed
over a fight with whites in the yard
Black me
n dead
A white man injured
Yet the prison guard who sniped them was exonerated
Justifiable homicide so they say
No warning shots
Just pop pop pop
Einy meeny miny mo
Shoot a nigga hope he dies slow
But when a guard gets killed it’s an American tragedy
It’s time for justice
Put the soledad 
brothers up for murder
If convicted… Death to three more niggas
Now that’s justice

George Jackson: Black Revolutionary by Walter Rodney 1971

To most readers in this continent, starved of authentic information by the imperialist news agencies, the name of George Jackson is either unfamiliar or just a name. The powers that be in the United States put forward the official version that George Jackson was a dangerous criminal kept in maximum security in Americas toughest jails and still capable of killing a guard at Soledad Prison. They say that he himself was killed attempting escape this year in August. Official versions given by the United States of everything from the Bay of Pigs in Cuba to the Bay of Tonkin in Vietnam have the common characteristic of standing truth on its head. George Jackson was jailed ostensibly for stealing 70 dollars. He was given a sentence of one year to life because he was black, and he was kept incarcerated for years under the most dehumanizing conditions because he discovered that blackness need not be a badge of servility but rather could be a banner for uncompromising revolutionary struggle. He was murdered because he was doing too much to pass this attitude on to fellow prisoners. George Jackson was political prisoner and a black freedom fighter. He died at the hands of the enemy.
Once it is made known that George Jackson was a black revolutionary in the white mans jails, at least one point is established, since we are familiar with the fact that a significant proportion of African nationalist leaders graduated from colonialist prisons, and right now the jails of South Africa hold captive some of the best of our brothers in that part of the continent. Furthermore, there is some considerable awareness that ever since the days of slavery the U.S.A. is nothing but a vast prison as far as African descendants are concerned. Within this prison, black life is cheap, so it should be no surprise that George Jackson was murdered by the San Quentin prison authorities who are responsible to Americas chief prison warder, Richard Nixon. What remains is to go beyond the generalities and to understand the most significant elements attaching to George Jacksons life and death.
When he was killed in August this year, George Jackson was twenty nine years of age and had spent the last fifteen [correction: 11 years] behind bars—seven of these in special isolation. As he himself put it, he was from the lumpen. He was not part of the regular producer force of workers and peasants. Being cut off from the system of production, lumpen elements in the past rarely understood the society which victimized them and were not to be counted upon to take organized revolutionary steps within capitalist society. Indeed, the very term lumpen proletariat was originally intended to convey the inferiority of this sector as compared with the authentic working class.
Yet George Jackson, like Malcolm X before him, educated himself painfully behind prison bars to the point where his clear vision of historical and contemporary reality and his ability to communicate his perspective frightened the U.S. power structure into physically liquidating him. Jacksons survival for so many years in vicious jails, his self-education, and his publication of Soledad Brother were tremendous personal achievements, and in addition they offer on interesting insight into the revolutionary potential of the black mass in the U.S.A., so many of whom have been reduced to the status of lumpen.
Under capitalism, the worker is exploited through the alienation of part of the product of his labour. For the African peasant, the exploitation is effected through manipulation of the price of the crops which he laboured to produce. Yet, work has always been rated higher than unemployment, for the obvious reason that survival depends upon the ability to obtain work. Thus, early in the history of industrialization, workers coined the slogan the right to work. Masses of black people in the U.S.A. are deprived of this basic right. At best they live in a limbo of uncertainty as casual workers, last to be hired and first to be fired. The line between the unemployed or criminals cannot be dismissed as white lumpen in capitalist Europe were usually dismissed.
The latter were considered as misfits and regular toilers served as the vanguard. The thirty-odd million black people in the U.S.A. are not misfits. They are the most oppressed and the most threatened as far as survival is concerned. The greatness of George Jackson is that he served as a dynamic spokesman for the most wretched among the oppressed, and he was in the vanguard of the most dangerous front of struggle.
Jail is hardly an arena in which one would imagine that guerrilla warfare would take place. Yet, it is on this most disadvantaged of terrains that blacks have displayed the guts to wage a war for dignity and freedom. In Soledad Brother, George Jackson movingly reveals the nature of this struggle as it has evolved over the last few years. Some of the more recent episodes in the struggle at San Quentin prison are worth recording. On February 27th this year, black and brown (Mexican) prisoners announced the formation of a Third World Coalition. This came in the wake of such organizations as a Black Panther Branch at San Quentin and the establishment of SATE (Self-Advancement Through Education). This level of mobilisation of the nonwhite prisoners was resented and feared by white guards and some racist white prisoners. The latter formed themselves into a self-declared Nazi group, and months of violent incidents followed. Needless to say, with white authority on the side of the Nazis, Afro and Mexican brothers had a very hard time. George Jackson is not the only casualty on the side of the blacks. But their unity was maintained, and a majority of white prisoners either refused to support the Nazis or denounced them. So, even within prison walls the first principle to be observed was unity in struggle. Once the most oppressed had taken the initiative, then they could win allies.
The struggle within the jails is having wider and wider repercussions every day. Firstly, it is creating true revolutionary cadres out of more and more lumpen. This is particularly true in the jails of California, but the movement is making its impact felt everywhere from Baltimore to Texas. Brothers inside are writing poetry, essays and letters which strip white capitalist America naked. Like the Soledad Brothers, they have come to learn that sociology books call us antisocial and brand us criminals, when actually the criminals are in the social register. The names of those who rule America are all in the social register.
Secondly, it is solidifying the black community in a remarkable way. Petty bourgeois blacks also feel threatened by the manic police, judges and prison officers. Black intellectuals who used to be completely alienated from any form of struggle except their personal hustle now recognize the need to ally with and take their bearings from the street forces of the black unemployed, ghetto dwellers and prison inmates.
Thirdly, the courage of black prisoners has elicited a response from white America. The small band of white revolutionaries has taken a positive stand. The Weathermen decried Jacksons murder by placing a few bombs in given places and the Communist Party supported the demand by the black prisoners and the Black Panther Party that the murder was to be investigated. On a more general note, white liberal America has been disturbed. The white liberals never like to be told that white capitalist society is too rotten to be reformed. Even the established capitalist press has come out with esposes of prison conditions, and the fascist massacres of black prisoners at Attica prison recently brought Senator Muskie out with a cry of enough.
Fourthly (and for our purposes most significantly) the efforts of black prisoners and blacks in America as a whole have had international repercussions. The framed charges brought against Black Panther leaders and against Angela Davis have been denounced in many parts of the world. Committees of defense and solidarity have been formed in places as far as Havana and Leipzig. OPAAL declared August 18th as the day of international solidarity with Afro-Americans; and significantly most of their propaganda for this purpose ended with a call to Free All Political Prisoners.
For more than a decade now, peoples liberation movements in Vietnam, Cuba, Southern Africa, etc., have held conversations with militants and progressives in the U.S.A. pointing to the duality and respective responsibilities of struggle within the imperialist camp. The revolution in the exploited colonies and neo-colonies has as its objective the expulsion of the imperialists: the revolution in the metropolis is to transform the capitalist relations of production in the countries of their origin. Since the U.S.A. is the overlord of world imperialism, it has been common to portray any progressive movement there as operating within the belly of the beast. Inside an isolation block in Soledad or San Quentin prisons, this was not merely a figurative expression. George Jackson knew well what it meant to seek for heightened socialist and humanist consciousness inside the belly of the white imperialist beast.
International solidarity grows out of struggle in different localities. This is the truth so profoundly and simply expressed by Che

Guevara when he called for the creation of one, two, three - many Vietnams. It has long been recognized that the white working class in the U.S.A is historically incapable of participating (as a class) in anti-imperialist struggle. White racism and Americas leading role in world imperialism transformed organized labour in the U.S. into a reactionary force. Conversely, the black struggle is internationally significant because it unmasks the barbarous social relations of capitalism and places the enemy on the defensive on his own home ground. This is amply illustrated in the political process which involved the three Soledad Brothers—George Jackson, Fleeta Drumgo and John Clutchette—as well as Angela Davis and a host of other blacks now behind prison bars in the U.S.A.

Carlos A. Cooks: The Ideological Son of Marcus Mosiah Garvey

"The culture of a people is best manifested by the homage they pay to those who led with dedication and devotion to freedom and cause."—Carlos A. Cooks 

If, as the new saying goes, “truth is [really] on its way” then, perhaps, Black People can finally also be back on their way. Which way? The way out of all of the confusion, contradictions and cultural degeneration that has retarded the liberation of our people these last few years.Truth is not an abstract, it refers to sincerity, honesty, conformity to fact, correctness, exactitude, et cetera. Carlos Cooks was truth personified. It is also the truth that, if one man can be singled out as, the individual personality, most responsible for the resurrection on Marcus Garvey’s philosophy and program then that man is Carlos Cooks.

Carlos Cooks was to Black Nationalism what John Coltrane was to the so-called avant-grade “jazz”, and what Aretha is to soul music; the prime progenitor among their respective peers.
The main difference was the fact that during his life time, Cooks never receive his proper recognition. This was mainly because he was denied national coverage — by white and “Black” press — and was bound by an oath (the sacri) not to seek publicity for himself.

But since programs are often personified within certain individuals, and either live beyond or die along with their respective advocates, AJASS believes that — if we are really going to re-establish truth in our Liberation Struggle, then more of our people should know about the relevance of Carlos Cooks.

Carlos A. Cooks was born on June 23, 1913 in the Dominican Republic and died May 5th, 1966 in Harlem. During his 52 years on this planet, he passed through a phenomenal experience by spending his entire lifetime dedicated to the liberation of Africa, its universal communities, and all its peoples. This fact alone puts him among the ranks of the Hon. Marcus Garvey and the grand patriarch of the, movement, Hon. Edward Wilmot Blyden.

It was Carlos Cooks who administered the Advance Division of the UNIA after Garvey’s deportation. He fought psychologically and physically — to uplift Mr. Garvey’s name from the gutters of ghetto minds. Brother Frank Rockwood of the Harlem UNIA branch can attest to this truth.

It was Carlos Cooks who coined the phrase “BUY BLACK” as an economic solvency in the various African Communities throughout America. Attorney Cora Walker, who successfully engineered the Harlem Co-op market can vouch for that.

It was Carlos Cooks who found the first so-titled African Nationalist organization. Check it out with Brothers and Sisters of the African Nationalist Pioneer Movement, they will tell you.

It was Carlos Cooks whom the late Malcolm X told many of us, that: “I respect Mr. Cooks because he is real Garveyite, a true Black Nationalist!” Since truth is supposed to be the only way, ask Sister Betty Shabazz about this.

It was Carlos Cooks who kept Garvey’s UNIA Red, Black, and Green tricolors displayed daily and nightly. Go on over to the African Market at 125th Street near Lenox Avenue, ask for Brother Frank Jones ‘cause he can tell you about it.

It was Carlos Cooks who maintained an African Nationalist Legion, mentally prepared and physically ready to join the African Liberation struggle. I don’t know if the rest of the officials of the Republic of New Africa know this, but I’m sure that Brother Herman Ferguson does.

It was Cooks who continuously advocated armed retaliation against the cracker beasts who viciously murdered our Brothers and Sisters in the South. Truth is supposed to be on its way, so ask Brother Robert Williams.

It was Carlos Cooks who designated August 17th — the birthday of Marcus Garvey — as the first Black holiday, official or unofficial. And if you ask James Lawson (privately), the Brother will probably tell you the truth, too.

It was Carlos Cooks who first perfected an oratorical art of street speaking from his step-ladder, all over Harlem, but, especially on 125th Street and 7th Avenue. Brother Ed. “Porkchop” Davis and Brother Charles Kenyatta can verify that as the truth.

It was Carlos Cooks who first formed an independent school, complete with a course in Kiswahili at a time (1954) when many of our people didn’t even know where Africa was, never mind what Swahili was. Brother Al Vann, of the African-American Teachers Association, can educate you to the truth about this.

It was Carlos Cooks who first defined the difference between the terms Black and/or African as opposed to “Negro” and fought to have the latter word abrogated as a racial classification. You can even ask Richard Moore (author of The Word Negro And Its Evil Use) about this. Or you can read the documentation of this in “BLACK NATIONALISM: A Search For Identity In America” by Prof. E. U. Essien-Udom of the University of Ibadan, Nigeria. He printed some truth about this particular issue.

It was Carlos Cooks who organized the Universal African Relief to send tons of cloths and medical supplies to our struggling fellow Africans in South West Africa and Angola — over ten year ago. Ask Brother Hage Geingob of SWAPO or any of the other Brothers representing the liberation forces in Namibia (Southwest Africa). Their case is based on truth.

It was Carlos Cooks who first initiated the concept of natural hair as an issue of racial pride through his ANPM’s MISS NATURAL STANDARD OF BEAUTY CONTEST. But just about everyone who comes in contact with AJASS knows this because our programs are based on truth and, so, we always let everyone know just where we’re coming from. (Don’t bother to ask the folks running the “Miss America Beauty Contest.) - Carlos A Cooks 

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Releasing Aging Prisoners Project (R.A.P.P.) By Herman Bell

Hello, everybody - my name is Herman Bell. I've been imprisoned since 1973 (for nearly 40 years). I am 65 years old. I've appeared before five parole boards and have been denied five times. Each Board recognizes my considerable accomplishments: program fulfillment, release plans, letters of support, and that I have no disciplinary concerns. But I'm still denied parole. The Board writes that after careful review, release at this time is incompatible with the welfare of society, and they say that my release would deprecate the serious nature of my charge of conviction. Thus, the Board is resentencing me, as it does others, for an offense on which the court has already pronounced judgment.

I am a former member of the Black Panther Party. I am a violent offender. I was convicted and sentenced in 1975 to 25 years to life. Fortunately, violent offenders are not precluded from parole. A 25-years-to-life sentence does not mean life without the possibility of parole. Yet, "life without parole" is precisely what I and countless other NYS prisoners similarly sentenced are subjected to by the NYS Parole Board.


A New York State study revealed that people released after serving long sentences for murder (mostly older individuals) had the lowest recidivism rate for committing a new offense, 1.3% -- lower than any other category of those released. Research show that, by age 50, most people have outlived the years they are most likely to commit crimes. At age 50, the research shows the recidivism rate drops to just over 2% and to almost 0% by age 65.
Years ago, the New York State Parole Board actually had authority to set a minimum sentence of a convicted person when the court had not. Today, though, the Board is no longer charged with that sentencing responsibility; yet, it persists in doing so with continual two-year-hits after two-year hits which, for so many elder prisoners, results in de facto resentencing to life without parole.

What does the aging prisoner issue hope to accomplish? Aside from changing the narrative in the perception of crime and punishment, the aging prisoner issue concern men and women who've served long sentences in prison, who've fulfilled all statutory and structural requirements, and yet are still being denied parole. Research and statistics show that they pose no appreciable "safety risk" to society. So the aging prisoner issue is asking: "Why are there elder men and women not being released from prison?" A fresh look at this quasi-legal, unproductive policy is called for. Release of these aging prisoners would free-up funds that can alleviate some of our pressing social service needs - such as schools, health care, housing, and job-skill training.
In these troubling times of mass incarceration, prison as a profit-making industry, and unabated racial persecution, the call for balance, fairness and accountability in the NYS parole process is all the more pressing. The injustice of unending incarceration demands that we seriously address this unproductive policy of denying elderly men and women parole.
A change in the narrative and perception of crime and punishment is long overdue, and the issue of "aging prisoners" is a social justice issue. Exchanging our views will hopefully lead to organizing to secure elders' release; elders coming home can enrich our families and communities and free up desperately needed resources for our people. I feel confident that we can achieve this goal.

BLACK LEADERSHIP, OPPORTUNISTS, SPONTANEITY & THE "NEW" MILLION YOUTH MARCH -Dhoruba Bin Wahad

Without a strategic vision pro-action is almost impossible because one cannot account for the subjective factors (with or without a "strategy") it is practicable then to err on the side organization tactically, rather than with spontaneous "knee-jerk" responses. We must understand what the opposition's game plan is, or lack there-of and translate that understanding into a coherent "action program". Needless to say leadership is key, and jackanape politics does indeed complicate things because such politics reflect shallow depth of analysis.  This almost comical state of affairs lends itself to a proliferation of not only Internet activists, studio militants, and Talk Show analysts eager for ratings and self promotion, but also allows Gatekeepers and their loyal opposition with access to money to dominate the public dialogue who reduce the serious issues of our day to jokes and ignorant pontification. Sadly, few fully appreciate that both spontaneous rallies and spontaneous rebellions (violence) have limited but undeniable utility only when there is a relatively coherent mass movement with bonafide tactical and strategic objectives that translate possible reactionary responses into a revolutionary political context (or influence).  Indeed MLK, Lowery, and the entire leadership pantheon of the "Civil Rights" era would have not been as effective in the tactical struggle against institutional apartheid in America were it not for the spontaneous rebellions in the street.  Historically we know this from our national organization of NCCF's during the height of the state's repression to the Black Liberation Movement/Anti-War movement/and Worker's movements. 

The subjective impact of the policies of America's political elite on a diverse youthful segment of American society during the 60s and 70s brought mass protest to a peak by the late 60s and a tidal wave of institutional reforms in the 70s that were subsequently rolled back as the mass civil-rights, anti-war, and anti-racist movements were circumscribed by reforms that would herald the rise of a new Gatekeeper class.  Under these conditions the united front against fascism grew exponentially giving rise to the original "Rainbow Coalition" concept that Jessie would later use to Jack milk Corporations out of money and get his cronies hired.  Compare that period to the recent crisis of Finance Capitalism that created the OWS movement and how easily it was essentially smashed because lacked both a coherent movement and political strategic vision expressed in concrete organization. But the point is obvious:  Rallies, demonstrations, marches, boycotts are each offensive expressions of a movements strengths and when poorly planned or executed they signal weakness. The enemy understands that. So when delusional activists claim they are "shutting" down a city and can barely muster 200 people at a rally, or put a "million" before for the word march, and when their march jumps off only 500 people show up, or demonstrate every day for three years pushing an emotional agenda while the local power structure hardly misses a beat; Should speak volumes about the weaknesses of left opportunism.  Mass mobilization reflects effective organization. 


 On the other hand, the subjective factor is the dynamic factor in all human struggles.   It cannot be programmed Calculated.  This is called by reactionary and racist policy makers the "fog of war".  The unaccountable, unforeseen, concealed. So sometimes people in their outrage, indignation, will seize the historical moment, and throw themselves on the system. Trailing behind such momentum can be equally reactionary as the opportunists who exploit peoples sense of vulnerability and injustice for their own ends because, as MLK once said, "violence is the language of the voiceless" and it would therefore be our duty to speak truth to both power and charlatans, allies and adversaries alike in order for people to appreciate where they are headed and being led. There should be no "behind closed door" critiques with people who's track record on the issues is dubious at best and reactionary at worst.  People need to know the nature of the people who would presume to "lead" them somewhere. Those who say contrary have much to hide and little they want explain.  Give People a voice. The deficiencies of groups like NBPP, NAACP, NAN, et al and many Faith Based formations (tho perhaps unintentional) often cannot compensate for their own exclusivity. By that I mean their tactical irrelevancy far outweighs their strategic political value in the construction of a truly independent political power base.  We are being led down primrose lane right now by the same mind-set of Black establishment leadership that allowed 2.5 million people to be locked up by the state pursuing a bogus war on drugs.  It was on the watch of the so called Black leaders and messianic figures who today focus on effects (rather than abolish the causes) that the system of the "New Jim Crow" was erected. These leaders are reinvigorated by the the Martin verdict and think they can lead folks astray again for their own  political aggrandizement.  


Then there are the opportunists who's inability to mobilize people on a large scale causes them to seize upon the "dramatic moment" for relevancy and self-value.  It is such Left opportunism that permits corporate and reactionary mass media to seize upon the ridiculous behavior of the ill-disciplined, untrained, and apolitical rabble rousers to defame legitimate resistance.  The enemy draws propaganda sustenance from the "waffle n chicken" dialectics of  Black Left opportunism using racist liberal coding to denigrate progressive militant action, militant proactive organizations, and out of the box analysis that does not comport with conventional wisdom and dogma.  When the Sylvia's of the Hood become "action central" for activists mobilizing people on food-stamps (and there's no "free lunch" program" there then you know the deal).  Black people's condition cry out for principled fearless leadership and uncompromising analysis but sadly we are trapped between opportunists on the Left, and collaborationists on the Right at a point in time when the NSS has unlimited power. Maybe you should just order some spicy wings to go.....